Showing posts with label movie reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movie reviews. Show all posts

Good Boy (2025) Review: A Bold and Original Dog’s-Eye Horror Story

Good Boy

Directed by: Ben Leonberg

Written by: Alex Cannon, Ben Leonberg

Starring: Indy the Dog, Shane Jensen

Release Date: October 3, 2025

Good Boy (2025), directed by Ben Leonberg, is a chilling and original horror film told entirely from a dog’s perspective. Starring Indy the retriever, this daring experiment blends loyalty, fear, and supernatural terror into one unforgettable story.



A Fresh Take in a World of Recycled Horror

Hollywood has long been plagued by remakes, reboots, and derivative sequels. Truly original films are rare, which is why Good Boy deserves celebration. Director Ben Leonberg has crafted something audacious: a horror movie seen entirely through the eyes of a dog.

The film follows Indy, a loyal retriever, as he tries to protect his owner Todd (Shane Jensen) from an unseen supernatural force. By anchoring the story in Indy’s perspective, Good Boy achieves a blend of innocence, loyalty, and primal fear that feels entirely fresh within the horror genre.

The Story: Loyalty Meets Supernatural Terror

The film wastes no time in setting the stakes. Todd has been bleeding in his sleep, a disturbing problem that his loyal dog notices before he does. Indy refuses to leave Todd’s side, nudging him awake and showing a protective instinct that sets the tone for the entire movie.

Exposition comes sparingly. A phone call from Todd’s sister suggests deeper issues—possibly illness or addiction—that complicate his situation. Soon after, Todd takes Indy to a secluded family cabin, a location steeped in ominous history. It was here that Todd’s grandfather died alone with only his own dog for company, a haunting parallel to Todd’s current plight.

As Indy explores the cabin, he begins to sense and even “see” things Todd cannot: eerie sounds, phantom barking, and the suggestion of the grandfather’s loyal dog still lingering in the shadows. The basement, in particular, provides one of the film’s most unsettling sequences, where Indy’s bravery clashes with his instinctive fear.

Why the Dog’s Perspective Works

At its core, Good Boy relies on the bond between humans and dogs. Leonberg and co-writer Alex Cannon understand the emotional shorthand that comes with seeing through Indy’s eyes. We project loyalty, love, and courage onto him—not because Indy understands these concepts, but because we believe he does.

Indy doesn’t “act” in the traditional sense; he simply behaves like a dog. His warm eyes, curious movements, and unshakable presence allow the audience to fill in the emotional gaps. This makes him the perfect vessel for our fears and hopes, especially when the supernatural threat emerges.

The result is an intimate, emotional horror experience. We don’t want Indy to be hurt, and we don’t want him to lose Todd. That fear is the engine of the film, and it works because nearly everyone has felt the unspoken bond between themselves and a pet.

Experimental but Accessible

Of course, Good Boy is not for everyone. The movie requires viewers to project human emotions—such as loyalty and love—onto Indy in order to fully engage. If you cannot make that leap, the experiment may feel too abstract.

But for those willing to embrace the concept, the film delivers a hauntingly effective story. It is both experimental in form and emotionally accessible, tapping into the universal love people have for their dogs. That’s what makes the scares so sharp and the emotional beats so resonant.

Final Thoughts: Man’s Best Friend Meets Fear

Good Boy is a rare thing: an original horror movie that succeeds on its own terms. Director Ben Leonberg dares to tell a story through the uncomprehending but deeply loyal eyes of a dog, and the gamble pays off.

Indy may not know he’s in a movie, but the audience knows they are watching something special. If you love dogs and are open to an inventive twist on horror, Good Boy is one of the most unique cinematic experiences of 2025.

Star Rating

⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5 stars)

Directed by: Chris Columbus

Written by: David Simkins

Starring: Elisabeth Shue, Keith Coogan, Anthony Rapp, Penelope Ann Miller

Release Date: July 3, 1987

⭐️⭐️⭐️½ (3.5 out of 5)

Revisit Adventures in Babysitting (1987), Chris Columbus’s charming directorial debut starring Elisabeth Shue. This 80s cult favorite blends teen comedy, suburban satire, and pure heart for an unforgettable night out in Chicago. A Lovable Relic of 80s Teen Comedy

 

When Adventures in Babysitting hit theaters in 1987, few could have guessed that this modest teen comedy would become such a beloved 80s relic. Directed by Chris Columbus in his feature debut and starring the effortlessly appealing Elisabeth Shue, the film captures both the reckless fun and innocent sweetness of a bygone era of studio comedies.


Now nearly four decades later, the movie remains a charming time capsule — a story about a young woman thrust into chaos, navigating danger, city lights, and clueless boys with the poise of a true hero. It’s not perfect, but it’s bursting with personality, humor, and a big, silly heart.


Elisabeth Shue Shines as the Ultimate Babysitter


Elisabeth Shue plays Chris Parker, a suburban teen whose fancy date night gets canceled by her no-good boyfriend (a smarmy Bradley Whitford). With nothing better to do, she agrees to babysit the Anderson kids — Sara (Maia Brewton), an imaginative little girl obsessed with Thor, and her older brother Brad (Keith Coogan), who secretly adores Chris.


When Chris’s best friend Brenda (Penelope Ann Miller) calls in a panic from a Chicago bus station, Chris does what any self-respecting babysitter shouldn’t: she loads the kids into her mom’s station wagon and heads downtown to rescue her friend. Along for the ride is Brad’s wisecracking buddy Daryl (Anthony Rapp), who blackmails his way into the adventure.


A Night in the City — and One Misadventure After Another


From a flat tire on the expressway to a run-in with car thieves, mobsters, and blues musicians, Adventures in Babysittingunfolds as a whirlwind of absurd urban escapades. The tone is pure slapstick adventure, but what makes the movie sing is how earnestly it commits to the fun.


There’s even an unforgettable scene in a blues club where the gang is forced to perform a song about — you guessed it — babysitting. It’s utterly ridiculous, yet somehow delightful, especially with legendary bluesman Albert Collins on guitar.


Chris Columbus’s direction is rough around the edges, but that scrappiness gives the film its charm. The Chicago streets are grimy and chaotic, yet Columbus’s camera treats them with affection and humor. You can already sense the filmmaker who would go on to craft Home Alone and Mrs. Doubtfire, using suburban order clashing against urban chaos as the source of comedy.


A Sweet and Surprisingly Sincere Coming-of-Age Story


What elevates Adventures in Babysitting beyond its genre peers is its sense of sincerity. Beneath the gags and goofy peril lies a story about responsibility, growing up, and self-belief.


The standout emotional moment comes late in the film, when young Sara meets a mechanic who looks just like her hero Thor (played by a pre-Law & Order Vincent D’Onofrio). When he snaps at her, Sara insists he’s only acting that way because he doesn’t have his magic helmet — and then offers him hers. It’s a simple, touching gesture that captures the film’s earnest belief in the magic of kindness and imagination.


Columbus has always been gifted at moments like these — small, sincere beats in the middle of chaos — and this scene remains one of the sweetest of his career.


How It Holds Up Today


It’s true that Adventures in Babysitting contains a few outdated moments, particularly in its racial and gender politics, a common issue with many 80s comedies. But the film’s missteps feel more naïve than malicious. At its core, this is a movie about decency — about a young woman trying to do the right thing in an impossible situation.


Judged by the standards of its day, it’s a delightfully silly, often hilarious teen comedy that never forgets its heart. The performances are loose and joyful, the pacing brisk, and the city feels like a wild playground where danger and laughter exist side by side.


Final Thoughts


Adventures in Babysitting may not have the layered wit of Ferris Bueller’s Day Off or the rebellious edge of The Breakfast Club, but it doesn’t need to. Chris Columbus set out to make a fun, fast-paced urban adventure, and he succeeded.


Nearly 40 years later, it’s still an endlessly rewatchable crowd-pleaser — a film that reminds us that being a “babysitter” can be as heroic as being a superhero, especially when you’re played by Elisabeth Shue.

Anemone(2025) — Daniel Day-Lewis Returns with Raw Power


The Return of Daniel Day-Lewis

A Cabin in the Woods and the Ghosts Within

Brothers, Trauma, and Masculinity

A Meta Edge: Sean Bean and the Power of Expectation

Daniel Day-Lewis, Unmatched

A Confident Directorial Debut

Final Thoughts




Music Biopic Week: Rocketman (2019) — The Dream That Became Elton John


A Biopic That Dares to Dream

Taron Egerton Becomes Elton’s Reflection

The Complicated Friendship at the Heart of It All

Villains, Lovers, and Parents Through Elton’s Eyes

A Jukebox of Emotion

Final Thoughts



Movie Review: 3:10 to Yuma (2007) – A Masterful Modern Western


James Mangold’s 3:10 to Yuma (2007) is a gritty, muscular remake of the 1957 classic, itself based on Elmore Leonard’s short story. Starring Christian Bale and Russell Crowe, this modern western blends sharp psychological tension with thrilling shootouts. While Mangold had already shown he could tackle intimate drama (*Walk the Line*) and noir-ish thrillers (*Copland*), here he proves his hand at pure genre craftsmanship, creating a western for the 21st century that feels both fresh and timeless.

The premise is elegantly simple: down-on-his-luck rancher Dan Evans (Christian Bale) agrees to escort notorious outlaw Ben Wade (Russell Crowe) to catch the 3:10 train to Yuma prison. Wade’s gang, led by his feral right-hand man Charlie Prince (Ben Foster), is in hot pursuit. As the journey unfolds, what begins as a simple mission becomes a battle of wills, with Evans' integrity and Wade’s enigmatic morality clashing in fascinating ways.

  • Performances: Russell Crowe oozes charm and menace as Ben Wade, giving one of his finest performances. Christian Bale plays the straight-laced Dan Evans with quiet desperation and deep moral conflict. Ben Foster nearly steals the show with his volatile, unpredictable turn as Charlie Prince.
  • Direction: James Mangold strikes gold. His pacing is sharp, the action explosive, and his eye for character dynamics masterful. He keeps the film rooted in classic western structure while modernizing the emotional texture.
  • Dialogue: The script crackles with tension. The exchanges between Wade and Evans elevate the film far beyond shootouts. Their moral sparring is the real duel.
  • Cinematography & Design: The landscapes are dusty and expansive, and the production design evokes a lived-in, grimy Old West without ever looking artificial.
  • Stretching believability: Some might balk at the code of honor the film ultimately leans into, or the occasionally mythic sense of manhood. But for genre fans, that’s part of the appeal.
  • Supporting characters underused: While Peter Fonda’s presence as a grizzled bounty hunter is welcome, a few other characters don’t get much depth.

One of the most quietly riveting scenes unfolds over dinner at Dan Evans’ home. As Wade dines with the Evans family, a subtle power play takes place. Wade flirts—without overtly doing so—with Evans’ wife (Gretchen Mol). The tension in the room simmers below the surface. Mol’s performance is brilliant in its restraint, her flushed cheeks and nervous glances revealing volumes. Crowe exudes quiet confidence. Mangold shoots the scene in tight, intimate frames, drawing the characters closer even as nothing explicit is said. It’s a masterclass in subtext and tension.

3:10 to Yuma is a masterwork—brimming with tension, grit, and emotional depth. It’s not just about guns and grit; it’s about what makes a man, how far a person will go to reclaim self-respect, and whether even the worst men can surprise you. Mangold’s assured direction, Crowe’s devilish charisma, and Bale’s slow-burning intensity combine to create a modern classic. This is one western remake that not only justifies its existence—it surpasses the original in many ways.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars


What’s your favorite modern western? Drop a comment below with your thoughts on 3:10 to Yuma and let me know if you prefer this or the 1957 original!

Enjoyed this review? Check out more Western movie reviews here.

Movie Review: Fantastic Four (2015) – A Superhero Reboot That Falls Apart

Fantastic Four is a 2015 superhero film directed by Josh Trank. It stars Miles Teller, Kate Mara, Michael B. Jordan, and Jamie Bell as the iconic Marvel team. A dark, serious-minded reboot of the comic book classic, the film reimagines the team's origin but struggles with tone, pacing, and cohesion.

Plot Summary

Reed Richards (Miles Teller) and Ben Grimm (Jamie Bell) invent a prototype matter transporter that opens a portal to a parallel dimension. After being recruited by scientist Franklin Storm, Reed joins forces with Johnny Storm (Michael B. Jordan), Sue Storm (Kate Mara), and Victor Von Doom (Toby Kebbell) to explore the other world. But a catastrophic accident mutates them all. Now imbued with unstable powers, the group must confront personal demons, military interests, and an old friend-turned-enemy threatening to destroy Earth.

What Works
  • Performance: The cast—especially Michael B. Jordan and Jamie Bell—show promise, even if the script underuses them.
  • Direction: Josh Trank brings an initially intriguing, grounded approach to the material, aiming for a sci-fi tone reminiscent of *Chronicle*.
  • Potential: The film hints at compelling character dynamics, especially Ben’s tragic transformation and Reed’s guilt.
What Doesn't Work
  • Pacing: The origin story drags on for too long, with the team only coming together in the final minutes.
  • Visuals: Action sequences are muddled by flat, dark cinematography that undermines excitement.
  • Script & Structure: The film feels disjointed, with last-minute reshoots (and Kate Mara’s wig) emblematic of behind-the-scenes turmoil.
  • Tone: Grim and joyless, the film forgets the fun and family dynamic that made the Fantastic Four beloved in the first place.
Final Thoughts

Fantastic Four (2015) is a cautionary tale of studio interference, creative clashes, and missed potential. Despite a talented cast and a unique approach, it collapses under the weight of competing visions and an incoherent final act. This one is best remembered as a franchise misfire rather than a faithful adaptation.

Rating

Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars


What did you think of Fantastic Four (2015)? Leave a comment below or share your thoughts on what went wrong with this reboot!

If you enjoyed this review, check out my takes on other superhero movies here.

Relay (2025) Review: Riz Ahmed and Lily James Can’t Save This Thriller Snoozefest

Relay  Directed by: David Mackenzie Written by: Justin Piasecki Starring: Riz Ahmed, Lily James Release Date: August 22, 2025 Rating: ★☆☆☆☆...