Film Review: 13 Conversations About One Thing (2001)

Reviewed by Sean | Originally written: November 21, 2002 | Updated for seanatthemovies.blogspot.com


When the Conversation Goes Over Your Head


Don’t you hate it when someone tells a joke and you’re the only one who doesn’t get it? That’s exactly how I felt watching 13 Conversations About One Thing. After reading glowing reviews from critics and viewers alike, I’m left wondering—what did I miss?


From the minds of Jill and Karen Sprecher, the duo behind 1997’s Clockwatchers, this indie drama interweaves the stories of several New Yorkers grappling with fate, regret, and the elusive pursuit of happiness. It’s a film full of ideas—but for me, those ideas never quite landed.


Plot Overview: Intersections of Fate and Fragility


The film’s structure is a mosaic of loosely connected lives, each marked by a defining moment:

  • Matthew McConaughey plays a cocky, self-righteous lawyer who celebrates a courtroom victory at a bar where he meets a depressed insurance investigator, played by Alan Arkin. The man shares a tale about the fleeting nature of happiness. McConaughey shrugs it off, only to be involved in a hit-and-run accident on his way home—an event that leaves him morally rattled.

  • The victim is Beatrice (Clea DuVall), a kind-hearted cleaning woman whose sunny outlook is shattered in the aftermath. Her recovery challenges her relationships and sense of purpose.

  • John Turturro plays a college professor who abruptly leaves his wife (Amy Irving) in search of something deeper than contentment. His storyline runs parallel to the others, though the connection feels tenuous until the film’s final moments.


Each character’s arc reflects how one unexpected encounter or accident can fracture a life, and how our perception of happiness can shift in an instant.


Style Over Clarity?


13 Conversations About One Thing is structured like a puzzle. The film delivers a series of “Aha!” moments—revelations where storylines connect or repeat motifs across characters. Dialogue is often stylized, hinting that what’s said will echo later. Something uttered by Turturro’s character shows up again in Beatrice’s behavior. It’s clever on paper, but the execution feels forced.


The film also employs a non-linear timeline that left me more confused than intrigued. With so many secondary characters orbiting the four leads, it’s easy to lose track of the finer narrative threads. Important details are easy to miss unless you’re watching with intense focus. Case in point: Roger Ebert, in his glowing review, mentions Turturro’s obsession with routine—an aspect I completely overlooked. And apparently, that detail was key to understanding his character.


Final Thoughts: Searching for Meaning


Here’s the thing—I didn’t dislike 13 Conversations About One Thing. I just didn’t get it. I understood the central theme: that happiness, no matter how small, is a universal pursuit. But that’s such a broad idea. I kept hoping there would be more, a deeper message or emotional anchor. For me, it never quite materialized.


Still, I can’t deny this: the movie sparked great conversations. After watching it with friends, we talked about it for hours. Not about its message, necessarily—but about how baffled we all were. And maybe that’s the point. Maybe the movie isn’t about answers. Maybe it’s about asking the right questions.


If you love intricate, puzzle-like storytelling with philosophical overtones, you might find meaning here that I missed. But if you’re looking for emotional clarity or a satisfying resolution, be prepared to leave the theater scratching your head.


Verdict: 2.5 out of 5 stars


💬 A thoughtful, well-acted film that left me lost in its conversations. Great discussion fodder—but not a personal favorite.

Join the Conversation


Did 13 Conversations About One Thing speak to you in a way it didn’t for me? I’d love to hear your thoughts. Leave a comment below or connect with me on social media. And if you enjoy honest, reflective film reviews of indie gems and forgotten classics, be sure to follow Sean at the Movies for more!

Final Destination 3D (2009) Review – When Gore Meets Gimmickry | Sean at the Movies

Final Destination 3D (2009) Review – When Gore Meets Gimmickry

Directed by: David R. Ellis

Written by: Eric Bress

Starring: Bobby Campo, Shantel VanSanten, Mykelti Williamson

Release Date: August 28, 2009

Originally Published: August 28, 2009

A Familiar Formula, Now in 3D

It was George Carlin who once pointed out that “Final Destination” is a redundant phrase—after all, every destination is final. Yet in 2009, the franchise brought us The Final Destination, the fourth film in the series, wrapped in shiny new 3D packaging.

The premise remains the same: attractive young people narrowly escape a horrific mass-casualty event thanks to a psychic vision, only to be hunted down by death in creatively gruesome ways.

Exploding Racetracks and Predictable Mayhem

This time, our “final destination” is a NASCAR stadium, where Nick (Bobby Campo) foresees a fiery catastrophe. He manages to save several people, only to find that Death isn’t so easily cheated. One by one, the survivors meet their ends in elaborate, over-the-top sequences.

Highlights (or lowlights) include a flaming tire decapitation, a man dragged down the street while on fire, and a woman ground to pieces in an escalator. The audience I saw it with laughed like they were watching a stand-up special. And honestly? That might have been the right reaction.

Where's the Horror?

There was a time when gore meant something in horror. In films like Saw, death served a purpose, guided by the twisted but coherent philosophy of Jigsaw. Here, there’s no such structure. Just flying organs and splattered CGI.

I still love horror. I’m not above enjoying a splatterfest (*My Bloody Valentine 3D* was a blast). But there’s a difference between gory fun and lazy storytelling. *Final Destination 3D* confuses one for the other.

Final Thoughts

For fans of the franchise or gorehounds looking for a shallow thrill, *Final Destination 3D* might satisfy. But for anyone who craves actual suspense, stakes, or a coherent idea behind the carnage, this one’s a miss. A gimmick in search of a movie.

Rating: ★★☆☆☆ (2 out of 5)


Tags:

Final Destination 3D review, Final Destination series, horror movie reviews, 2009 horror films, Bobby Campo, David R. Ellis, gory horror movies, bad horror sequels, 3D horror movies, horror franchise fatigue, Sean at the Movies reviews

Revisiting Tobe Hooper’s The Funhouse – A Carnival of Horror and Disappointment Date: May 14, 2025

“A Carnival of Missed Opportunities: Revisiting Tobe Hooper’s Uneven Cult Slasher”

Tobe Hooper is one of my favorite horror filmmakers of all time. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre isn’t just a masterpiece—it’s a cultural landmark. But not every great director bats a thousand, and The Funhouse (1981) is proof of that.


In my latest review, I dive into this peculiar carnival-set slasher, now considered a cult classic by some, but still a tough sell for me. While the final act brings some much-needed energy and gore, the road there is long, meandering, and far too slow. It’s a film full of missed potential, weighed down by thin characters and a script that stalls for far too long.


That said, The Funhouse is far from worthless. Hooper’s love of old-school horror shows through in nods to FrankensteinPsychoFreaks, and more. There’s even an early homage to Halloween. It’s a movie that wants to be both a tribute and a terror ride—but struggles to deliver on either.


You can hear more of my thoughts on The Funhouse in the newest episode of the I Hate Critics Movie Review Podcast, available wherever you get your podcasts. We also upload full episodes to our YouTube channel and post trailers, movie news, and more on Facebook.


Read the full review on Vocal: [Horror.Media]

Follow me on Twitter: @PodcastSean

Find the podcast on Twitter: @CriticsPod and anywhere you listen to podcasts. 


Let me know what you think of The Funhouse. Cult classic? Underrated gem? Or a swing and a miss from one of horror’s most important voices?



Film Review: 13 Conversations About One Thing (2001)

Reviewed by Sean | Originally written: November 21, 2002 | Updated for seanatthemovies.blogspot.com When the Conversation Goes Over Your H...