Movie Review: Brothers

Brothers (2009) 

Directed by Jim Sheridan 

Written by David Benioff 

Starring Jake Gyllenhaal, Tobey Maguire, Natalie Portman, Sam Shepard, Clifton Collins Jr.

Release Date December 4th, 2009

Published January 10th, 2010

Streaming on Starz via Amazon Prime 

It's interesting how critics can disagree so thoroughly. When the movie Brothers was released in December of 2009 most critics praised the work of Tobey Maguire and touted him as an Oscar contender. When I considered the film I felt that Tobey Maguire's performance was the film's weakest link and that Jake Gyllenhaal was the standout.

Brothers arrives on DVD this week and you can weigh in on which actor you prefer or maybe you love them both. One thing is certain, while I have my reservations about Maguire's performance, this story of one brother thought lost in war and another finding himself in the company of family has moments of great power and deeply felt emotions.

Tommy Cahill (Jake Gyllenhaal) has long been the black sheep of his family. His father was a General (Sam Shepard) and his brother Sam (Tobey Maguire) has followed in dad's footsteps. While Tommy has bounced from job to job and finally a stint in prison, Sam joined the army, settled down with Grace (Natalie Portman) and had two beautiful daughters.

Despite their differences Tommy and Sam are close and Sam is there when Tommy gets out of prison. Soon after however he is off to war in Afghanistan leaving Tommy to try and reconnect with his family which because of strains with his dad is not easy and soon he is returning to some bad behaviors.

On a mission Sam's helicopter is shot down and he and another soldier are taken hostage. Grace is soon informed that her husband is dead. You likely know where this story is headed as Grace informs Tommy of his brothers seeming demise and the two begin to turn their mutual grief into a comforting romance that will become quite uncomfortable when Sam returns home.

Brothers was directed by the humanist director Jim Sheridan whose portraits of humanity In America and My Left Foot are filled such astonishing truth and beauty that it's no surprise they were mostly ignored by audiences though lauded by critics and awards givers. Sheridan's style focuses the action in the hearts and minds of tough, damaged characters and in Brothers that focus comes through in the remarkable work of Jake Gyllenhaal.

The actor once known as Bubble Boy continues to evolve into one of our finest actors and even when playing a role where he seems to have less range to play than his co-star he shines by so effortlessly bringing his inner turmoil to the surface with quiet dignity and not merely the grand gesture. 

Gyllenhaal's performance is illuminated next to the more showy and forceful performance of Tobey Maguire whose grandstanding shouting stand in for honest emotions and understanding. With far more range to play with from the trauma of war and perceived betrayal, Maguire fails to connect and simply falls back on scenery chewing. 

Natalie Portman is caught between the brothers and her performance is a little lost in the shuffle. Portman exudes pain and warmth in scenes with Gyllenhaal while cowering in fear in scenes with Maguire, Portman's performance struggles depending who she is sharing the screen with. 

Problems asides, Jim Sheridan's direction is masterful and the story evolves one powerful, emotional scene after another until it reaches exceptional climax. Gyllenhaal is MVP doing his best to ground the story in a believable emotional realm while Maguire overplays and Portman vacillates between the two extremes. 

Flawed but still moving, Brothers is worth renting for arguably the best performance in the career of Jake Gyllenhaal. Jake is making the big move to blockbusters in Prince of Persia this summer, here's hoping he brings the same strength he showed in Brothers to his first major blockbuster.

Movie Review: Armored

Armored (2009) 

Directed by Nimrod Antal

Written by James V. Simpson

Starring Matt Dillon, Columbus Short, Jean Reno, Laurence Fishburne, Skeet Ulrich

Release Date December 4th, 2009 

Published December 4th, 2009 

Streaming Rental via Amazon Prime 

Armored is the latest attempt by Hollywood to look engaged and aware of the current economic condition. At its center is a character making less than a living wage and about to lose his home and the desperate lengths he considers going to in order to save everything.

Columbus Short stars in Armored as Ty a former Iraq war veteran who returns home to a crumbling neighborhood and a teenage brother to take care of. The bank is looking to foreclose on Ty's house and the only job he can get is a part time gig as a guard working for an armored car company.

Ty's pal Mike (Matt Dillon) got him the job and does what he can to help him out. Mike has a plan, with the help of 4 other guards they will set up a robbery of their own trucks. 42 million dollars can go a long way toward solving Ty's problems but he only agrees to go along after a threat by child services to take his little brother away.

The plan comes off without a hitch, initially. Hiding the trucks in an abandoned industrial building the crew begins off-loading the cash when Baines (Laurence Fishburne) spots a homeless guy hiding in the building. He kills the guy and Ty realizes that things have gone too far. He locks himself in one of the trucks and sets off the alarm to try and draw attention. A cop (Milo Ventimiglia) does arrive and he too is shot. 

Ty makes an effort to save the cop and stop the bad guys and that is where Armored gets its juice. Directed by Nimrod Antal, Armored gets off to an exceptionally slow start but once it picks up some speed it gets pretty entertaining. Columbus Short is a likable actor who holds the screen well as well as our hero. Matt Dillon as the villain is backed up well  by Laurence Fishburne, Skeet Ulrich and Jean Reno.

As for how timely Armored is? The idea of a guy willing to rob an armored truck to save his house is more of a motivational conceit than a comment on our times. Armored isn't much related to our current economic conditions as it as a coincidence. This film has been made a few times before and could work just as well in a prosperous economy; there's always someone who’s struggling.

Armored is an old school action flick with good chase scenes, gunplay and a strong hero. Director Nimrod Antal takes a little while to get things going but the final act moves fast toward a satisfying action flick conclusion. If everything is tied up a little too neatly; call it a function of modern pop entertainment, modern audiences hate a down ending.


Movie Review: Avatar

Avatar (2009) 

Directed by James Cameron

Written by James Cameron

Starring Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldana, Sigourney Weaver, Stephen Lang, Michelle Rodriguez

Release Date December 18th, 2009 

Published December 18th, 2009 

Back in theaters September 23rd, 2022

Streaming Rental on Amazon Prime 

New generation tech in service of a Bush era mindset, W or HW, Avatar is James Cameron advancing film tech to a place no one has seen before while also a response to American imperialism as Cameron envisions it. The tech is phenomenal, the politics are so 2003. The story of Avatar begins just as James Cameron was crowning himself the King of the World. After his Titanic effort to bring an ocean set romance to screen, James Cameron surveyed the landscape of movies and saw that the form, as it was, could not capture his vision of his project.

So, the King of the World abdicated for several years, biding his time until movie technology caught up with his vision. After seeing Peter Jackson give life to Gollum in The Lord of the Rings Cameron finally saw something he could work with. Employing engineers and film geeks Cameron went to work advancing existing technology. That was 2006. Just about 3 years later, more than a decade after its conception, Avatar has arrived.

Sam Worthington stars in Avatar as Jake Sully a former Marine who was left in a wheelchair after a battle injury. Jake's troubles are increased with the death of his twin brother, a scientist who was to shove off for a very important mission. Since Jake has his brother's DNA he is capable of replacing him and does on a mission to a place called Pandora.

On Pandora Jake's new life will have him taking over an Avatar, a human hybrid of the planet's alien population called Na'vi. Jake's mind is transferred somehow into the body of a 10 foot, blue skinned, Na'vi warrior. He will use his Avatar to interact with the natives and convince them to move to another home, opening the way for an industrialist (Giovanni Ribisi) to move in and strip the area of a mineral called, I kind you not, Unobtainium. 

Jake's mission goes off course when he meets a sultry Na'vi princess named Neytiri (Zoe Saldana). She brings him into the Na'vi inner circle after a sign from her god tells her Jake has an important role in the destiny of the Na'vi. Indeed he does; Jake will become a true warrior and a leader after he gives up his militaristic loyalty to his human masters.

No points for guessing that Jake and Neytiri fall happily into cross-species love. The story is eerily similar to Dances with Wolves, minus Kevin Costner's ludicrous facial hair. A soldier in a strange land falls in with the natives and switches sides. I'm not spoiling anything unless you have managed to miss every trailer, commercial or review of Avatar.

Even if you have been living under a rock James Cameron's exceptionally weak script does nothing to hide its twists and turns. The script mindlessly telegraphs its every plot machination and character choice. However, as every other critic in the world reminds us, the plot is meaningless when such wondrous visuals are offered.

There is no doubt about it James Cameron's remarkable dedication to new film technology has rendered a mesmerizing digital landscape unlike any ever before on screen. The characters are stunningly realistic; the landscapes are marvelous and wait till you see the battles between flying gun ships and Na'vi on flying lizard-like creatures. Cameron has even rendered 3D in a way that isn't clunky and unnecessary.

For many the visual delights of Avatar will be more than enough to sell them on the idea of Avatar as a great movie. And, I must admit, the tech is phenomenal. I, however, needed something more.

The story told in Avatar is dopey, derivative and features dialogue so awful as to have Michael Bay look down his nose. Expository dialogue, sometimes necessary, is mind numbingly repeated throughout Avatar. Worse still are the awkward attempts at humor, most of which are dated to around the time Cameron conceived of Avatar.

Even worse still is Mr. Cameron’s preachy, dated subtext about war and natives, 9/11 and terrorism. Cameron is not the first, merely the latest, to exploit 9/11 imagery in order to manipulate the audience. The visual reference to 9/11 is part of Cameron's throwback to the Bush era politique.

It's a rather scattershot bit of commentary that regurgitates liberal complaints about a war for oil, in this case 'Unobtainium,' and an American policy of pre-emptive war that could fairly be called imperialism. All well and good except that these are the complaints of yesteryear.

Is it Cameron's fault that the zeitgeist passed him by? No, but he has to take the lumps for being unable to adapt. He's made a criticism of a President who is gone in an era when a new President looks forward to ending the policies of the past. Whining about a war for oil (Unobtainium) is exceptionally passé.

The soldier going native is even more dated. Dances With Wolves is over 20 years old now. The battle between the American government and American Indians has inspired far better and far less preachy defenses of a native people defending their way of life.

Returning, however, to the main point of Avatar, the technology, you will see this movie because the tech is far too fabulous to be ignored. You really must see Avatar just to say that you have seen what everyone will be talking about in film culture until the next time Cameron revolutionizes the medium. Just be prepared to ignore everything other than the visual splendor.

Movie Review Invictus

Invictus (2009) 

Directed by Clint Eastwood 

Written by Anthony Peckham

Starring Matt Damon, Morgan Freeman, Scott Eastwood 

Release Date December 11th, 2009 

Published December 10th, 2009

Streaming Rental on Amazon Prime 

In 1994 the world heralded the ascendancy of Nelson Mandela to the Presidency of South Africa, just three years after his release from Robben Island Prison where he was a political prisoner for nearly 30 years. Mandela and the man who freed him, then President F.W De Klerk were awarded jointly the Nobel Peace Prize as the political system called Apartheid was brought to an end.

Outsiders were aware that Mandela's election was not without strife but how close Mandela came to losing his country to racial, civil war is a story stirringly brought to light for the first time on the big screen in Clint Eastwood's “Invictus.” On the surface you might assume Invictus is a sports movie, rugby after all takes a major role, but the real story is about a leader, a politician and a legend.

The Rugby World Cup was less than a decade old when it came to South Africa for the first time. It wasn't really to be all that notable for the South African national team known as Springboks, the team wasn't supposed to go far. Then something extraordinary happened. One afternoon the captain of the team, Francois Pienaar (Matt Damon) received an invitation to tea with President Mandela.

It was at tea in the Presidential palace that Mandela asked for Pienaar's help in uniting the country. How could he do that? Win the Rugby World Cup. From there these two very different men were bound on a journey neither could have expected with Rugby becoming a unifying cause in a country on the verge of being torn apart forever.

Is that dramatic enough for you? Director Clint Eastwood's great achievement in “Invictus” is giving weight to Mandela's decision to make Rugby a political cause. In 1993-1994 Rugby remained a sport beloved only to whites. Mandela made the calculated decision to relate to the white population through Springboks, a decision not at all welcomed by black South Africans who had hoped the team and its green and yellow colors would be banished to history.

Pienaar's challenge is no less dramatic. Mandela made quite clear to Pienaar all that was at stake in this victory and what might happen if their gambit failed. Damon plays the conflict with humble determination. It's wonderfully subtle yet powerful work from the chameleonic Damon whose last role was a pudgy corn company executive.

As one might expect, Morgan Freeman perfectly embodies the man he has been destined to play, Nelson Mandela. As Roger Ebert and numerous others have pointed out, Freeman has been linked to a number of Mandela biopics over the years. Freeman has met and befriended Mandela and that pays off in “Invictus.” Freeman loses himself in Mandela's accent and manner from moment one, easily conveying the charm, savvy and cool of Mandela.

The real challenge for both Freeman and director Eastwood was not deifying Mandela. That has been the tendency of the handful of previous Mandela movies and they have mostly failed for it. Audiences generally agree with Mandela's greatness, his achievements speak for themselves, but the overly reverent approach puts audiences to sleep.

Freeman's take and Eastwood's direction focus on Mandela's humane charms. The soft voice, his frail health, Mandela suffered from exhaustion amongst other ailments from day one of his Presidency. These are not the outsized traits of a deity but the feel of a real, if exceptional, human being. Freeman's performance is so clever and charming that it may seem too small for some, especially those expecting something more sweeping and dramatic.

Sweeping, epic drama is not what you get in “Invictus.” This is not a film that pauses to marvel at its own dramatic importance. “Invictus” deepens and becomes important when we consider what Mandela and Pienaar accomplished. “Invictus” works by letting us weigh the historic importance while the movie focuses on the story at hand. It’s a remarkable work from a remarkable group of filmmakers and one of the best films of 2009.

Column The Best Sequence in Hereditary

Hereditary (2018) 

Directed by Ari Aster 

Written by Ari Aster 

The Best Sequence in Hereditary 

The big death scene in Hereditary is the best scene in any movie in 2018. This article is about to go into great detail about this scene so if you have not seen Hereditary, which I feel is the best movie of 2018, you should stop reading after this introductory paragraph and come back after you have watched Ari Aster’s remarkable, debut masterpiece. This article will openly reveal a pivotal and shocking death of one of the main characters in Hereditary. 

A primer: Hereditary stars Toni Collette as Annie, an artist and stay at home mother. Annie crafts elaborate models of daily scenes from her home life, from the seemingly mundane, to the funeral of her recently deceased mother. Annie’s mother has recently died as the story begins but Annie is strangely lacking in profound emotion. Annie’s husband, Steve (Gabriel Byrne), is dutiful and supportive. While Annie and Steve’s son, Peter (Alex Wolff), is a typically aloof and above it all teenager. 

Daughter Charlie (Milly Shapiro), however, appears to take her grandmother’s passing far harder than anyone else. Her emotion is not outward, per se, Charlie is a special needs child though the film is vague on her exact condition. Charlie expresses her grief in odd behaviors that include a disturbing fascination with a dead bird which she finds at school and brings home. What she does with the bird from there you can discover in the film. It’s a terrifying visual detail that pays off in terrific horror. 

Our scene is set when Peter wants to go to a party and his mother instructs him to take Charlie to the party with him. While Peter is off getting high at the party, Charlie has a piece of cake, unaware that the cake has nuts and she has an allergic reaction. As a paranoid and terrified Peter rushes Charlie to the hospital, Charlie struggles to breath and eventually leans her head out of the car window to get more air. 

An out of control Peter nearly crashes the car into a telephone pole but as he swerves to miss it, Charlie’s head strikes the pole and is taken completely off. Director Ari Aster never shows us what happened to Charlie. There is no outward gore in the scene. Instead, in a masterful, and far more terrifying move, Aster keeps the camera on Peter as the tragedy that has just taken place slowly dawns on him. 

A shocked Peter stays in the car, afraid to look behind him and confirm what has taken place. He lingers for some time before finally putting the car in gear and beginning to slowly drive away from the scene, a lonely, empty, highway not far from his family home but far enough from any city to remain empty for some time. Peter drives home and the only time Aster leaves Alex Wolff’s stunned face is to establish as Peter pulls into the family driveway, gets out of the car as if lost in a fugue state and wanders inside. 

We return to Peter’s incomprehensibly stunned face as he climbs into bed and lies there for hours unable to sleep and unable to remain awake to the terror that has befallen him. We sit with Alex as the night passes into morning. We stay on Alex’s face as the house comes alive with the sound of Alex’s parents rising and beginning their day. The camera never cuts away from Alex, the terror that is about to unfold is mostly in sound design and scraps of mundane dialogue. 

Annie and Steve call out for Charlie and Peter to come to breakfast. Annie begins to worry where Charlie is. She calls for her. She begins to go to the door, we hear only her footsteps and the sound of the front door opening, we’re still on Alex’s profoundly horrified and paralyzed face. The door opens, we hear the crunch of Annie’s footsteps on the rocks in the driveway, we hear her approach the car and finally, we hear a blood curdling scream before we finally cut away. 

Great directing is about choices and the choices that Ari Aster makes in this moment to stick closely to the face of actor Alex Wolff is a daring and ingenious choice. The horror of the moment can hardly match the horror of what we assume this moment looks like in reality. Our imagination fills in the horror and because we care for Peter, our horror is magnified by a deep and stomach churning empathy. 

This, for me, is among the finest pieces of direction I have ever seen in a horror or genre movie and really, among any kind of movie. It’s a relatively simple manipulation of our collective imagination and yet many directors would ruin it by trying to shock us with horror visuals. Aster knows that our imagination of this moment is more powerful than mere gore. Besides, the rest of the movie has plenty of gore to satisfy that part of our genre hunger.  

Movie Review Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows Pt 2

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 2 (2011) 

Directed by David Yates 

Written by Steve Kloves 

Starring Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Ralph Fiennes, Helena Bonham Carter, Robbie Coltrane, Warwick Davis 

Release Date July 15th, 2011 

Published July 14th, 2011 

Streaming at BravoTV.com 

An epic end to an epic franchise; "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 2" brought to close one of the most remarkable film series ever crafted. Over seven films we have watched three young actors give glorious life to three extraordinary characters; characters who will go down in cinema history for their impact on the box office and our popular culture.

Where Were We?

When last we left Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe), in "Deathly Hallows Pt. 1," our heroic boy wizard had buried his late friend Dobby. Meanwhile, the evil Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) had discovered Dumbledore's crypt and taken possession of the deadly Elder Wand, one of the three Deathly Hallows.

The action of "Deathly Hallows Pt. 2" picks up with Harry confronting a goblin and coaxing him into leading him and Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) into Gringotts Bank. There, they hope to enter a vault belonging to the villainous Bellatrix LeStrange (Helena Bonham Carter) where one of Lord Voldemort's Horcruxes is being held.

What's a Horcrux Again?

A horcrux, for those unaware, is a piece of Voldemort's soul hidden in mundane form. Harry, Ron and Hermione have spent much of the past two films seeking several of these Horcrux and gone about destroying them. In the process they have weakened Voldemort but also made him angrier and ever more dangerous.

Our heroes believe that the final Horcrux resides at their old home, Hogwarts. This belief leads to a risky return to the school and a rendezvous with a few old friends who will play key roles in helping Harry in his final confrontation with He Who Shall Not Be Named. You really have to love the portentous language of the Potter Universe. In "Deathly Hallows Pt. 2" keep an ear open for the first time a character actually uses Voldemort's name, the reaction is priceless.

Movie vs. Book

I will go no further in talking about the plot as spoilers come far too easily. I will tell you that fans I watched the film with told me that book fans will be surprised and saddened by several of director David Yates's choices. Yates cut "Deathly Hallows Pt. 2" to the bone making it the shortest film of the series. In the process a few beloved scenes from the book have been excised and others have been shortened for time.

Fans I saw the film with were not angry about the changes from the book so don't expect to be too disappointed Potter-ites. Indeed, I don't believe anyone will walk away from "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 2" disappointed. Director David Yates has done a masterful job of delivering adventure, excitement and pathos in heavy portions.

Powerful Emotional Punch

Thanks to the remarkable performances of Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint fans of the Harry Potter series will be left breathless one moment, elated the next and likely will have shed a few tears along the way. "Deathly Hallows Pt. 2" delivers more than a few really powerful emotional punches. I was particularly moved by one character's long time unrequited love.

For me, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 2" is a perfect close to this epic series which thankfully has not overstayed its welcome. Yes, the series threatened to hang on too long but credit David Yates, screenwriter Steve Kloves, and this wonderful cast for helping to keep us patient and invested in this now decade long film series. Their remarkable hard work has made this final Potter adventure the best of the series.

Movie Review Horrible Bosses 2

Horrible Bosses 2 (2014) 

Directed by Sean Anders

Written by Sean Anders, John Morris 

Starring Jason Bateman, Charlie Day, Jason Sudeikis, Jennifer Aniston, Jamie Foxx, Chris Pine 

Release Date November 26th, 2014 

Published November 25th, 2014

Streaming on HBO Max 

“Horrible Bosses 2″ is a strange experience. While it was happening I laughed and it seemed to be working. I step away from it however,  and time is unkind. “Horrible Bosses 2″ unravels like a homemade Christmas sweater when placed under a critical eye.

Jason Bateman, Jason Sudeikis and Charlie Day are back in the roles of Nick, Curt and Dale and out from under the yoke of their horrible bosses that they attempted to kill in the 2011 original. Striking out on their own they have an invention that they hope will make them their own Bosses. Unfortunately, though the product does attract financiers, our heroes’ business instincts leave them in the hole and forced once again to extreme measures.

2 time Academy Award winner Christoph Waltz is the big bad Boss this time who quickly hoodwinks the trio out of their invention. Waltz’s Bert Hanson takes little time outwitting our heroes leading to the scheme that is the center point of the film: kidnapping Hanson’s son Rex (Chris Pine) in hopes to score enough ransom to save the company and the dream of not having a boss.

Starring Jason Bateman, Jason Sudeikis, Charlie Day, Jamie Foxx, Chris Pine, Jennifer Aniston and Christoph Waltz

Energy is the main reason why “Horrible Bosses 2″ works in the moment but does not sustain itself in memory. The laughs that the film generates come from the immediate energy with which Bateman, Sudeikis, Day and Pine interact. Each segment of “Horrible Bosses 2″ plays out the same way: a scene begins with one character introducing a plot point and then the other actors riff on it until things get loud enough for Bateman to throw cold water on the whole thing as the straight man.

Scene after scene in “Horrible Bosses 2″ plays out in the exact same fashion and eventually the law of diminishing returns kicks in. As a change up, the third act turns nasty with an unexpected murder and the return to the plot of Jennifer Aniston’s sexpot and Jamie Foxx’s hustler each to lesser levels of excitement and humor.

I’m being hard on “Horrible Bosses 2″ and yet I really did laugh a lot during the movie. Bateman, Sudeikis and Day can’t help but be funny together and the obvious freedom they have to invent their dialogue allows them to bounce off each other in the colorful and familiar fashion of real friends.

Those interactions however, even as they are funny in the moment, don’t have a lasting quality. Nothing about “Horrible Bosses 2″ resonates long after you see it. The energy of the moment dissipates quickly after the movie ends and what remains is the vague memory of laughs and some of the nastier parts of the plot that failed to enhance the humor.

Essay On the Female Characters in John Wick

On the Female Characters in John Wick 

John Wick (2014) 

Directed by Chad Stahelski 

Written by Derek Kolstad 

Starring Keanu Reeves, Adrienne Palicki, Bridget Moynahan, Bridget Regan

There is an aspect of John Wick that has been nagging at me and that is the treatment of women in the film. The movie isn’t openly hostile to women but you can definitely sense that every person involved in the creation of the story was a man.

Two female characters exist in John Wick, three if you want to count women with dialogue, an extra has a line that could fit this discussion later. The first is John Wick’s wife, Helen, played by Bridget Moynihan. Helen is the driving force for John to abandon his profession as a professional killer and settle into suburban life in New Jersey.

Essentially, she exists to make John less of a man because she forces him to give up who he is, and while she’s not portrayed as anything of a harridan, he gave up his life as a killer quite willingly, it’s clear by how quickly and ferociously he returns to killing that she had attempt to rob him of his very essence, who he truly was. This is a common fear among weak men that women are constantly attempting to change them.

The second woman in the story is Ms. Perkins, played by Adrienne Palicki, Ms. Perkins is a particularly egregious creation because she’s hyper-sexualized and yet she’s supposed to be one of the boys, a fellow killer. If however, she were truly one of the boys would she have made such a clumsy and flawed attempt at killing John Wick.

Ms. Perkins is also portrayed as greedy, a classic, cliched, narcissistic male portrait of women. Ms. Perkins willingly flogs the rules of The Continental, a hotel for killers with rules specifying that no killing can be done on the grounds of the hotel, a rule that has seemingly held for years until Ms. Perkins broke the rules to satisfy her greedy pursuit of the 4 million dollar bounty on John’s head.

Spoiler Alert:

Ms. Perkins meets her end in John Wick with a sizable level of overkill. After betraying and killing Willem Dafoe’s John Wick ally, Ms. Perkins is called to return to The Continental. She arrives in a stylishly lit park area where she is ushered into the center and informed that she can never return to The Continental. The warning however, does not suffice, as four large men emerge from the shadows forming a box on all sides of her. She is then shot from all angles.

Being that she is the only LIVING female in the movie, essentially the female lead, a better movie might have allowed her fate to have some narrative necessity, instead she is used as a prop in a secondary story and then discarded like trash, literally, a mythic crime scene clean up crew, seen earlier in the film at John Wick’s home to retrieve the body’s of oodles of dead, faceless henchmen, arrive to sweep her away like trash after sporting event.

So, Ms. Perkins, (I can’t stress this enough) the only LIVING, female character in the movie ends the film as just another faceless goon. This after she had made her clumsy, faltering, greedy attempt to kill John Wick, a task she, of course, failed at. And don’t think I have forgotten her efficient killing of a random fellow hitman at the hotel. That scene does not demonstrate her competence as a killer, it demonstrates that she is simply, and purely evil. Being that she is the lone woman in the movie what does that say about the film’s opinion of women?

I briefly mentioned a third female type in John Wick and that woman is a bartender at the bar in the basement of The Continental. Her name is Addy and she is played by a very beautiful actress named Bridget Regan. Addy only has one scene and it’s not a very important one. She exists to build the cult of John Wick. She functions as a John Wick fangirl, fawning over his return to the world of killers. Now, there was certainly little time for the movie to give Addy much weight or presence, but she does demonstrate a lack of imagination on the part of the filmmakers to cast a woman in the role of the fawning fan. That lack of imagination however, extends to the entire film’s roster of female characters.

So what is the point of this essay? Do I not like John Wick because of the treatment of women in the film? A little, if I’m being completely honest. I noticed the film’s attitude toward women which certainly says something about how the film treats women. I’m sure there are many other examples of films with anti-female attitudes but it really stuck out John Wick and it does effect how I feel about the film.

In my podcast, I Hate Critics you will hear me praise John Wick for its dark wit and well choreographed action and the exceptional level of detail given to sidelights like The Continental or the cleaning crew. All of that praise is true, I loved those aspects along with the performance of Michael Nyqvist as the lead bad guy, and Alfie Allen as the bad guy’s son, the character who’s actions bring John Wick back to the world of killers. I also liked Keanu Reeves whose least interesting qualities are hidden behind the film’s well portrayed action and propulsive plotting.

It wasn’t until further reflection and the reading of a feminist essay on a completely different movie, that I thought to consider my reservations about the way women were portrayed in John Wick and my appreciation of the film morphed into something I now feel slightly guilty about.

These thoughts on John Wick may, in fact, lead to further investigation of the way women have been portrayed in recent Hollywood features. This isn’t the first time I’ve had these thoughts this year, a year in which it seems as if roles for women have been greatly diminished.

Essay On the Warping Effect of Fame in Birdman and Beyond the Lights

Birdman (2014) 

Beyond the Lights (2014) 

Directed by Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu 

Directed by Gina Prince Blythewood 

The only things that the movies "Birdman" and "Beyond the Lights" have in common are that they are both movies and they both were released to a wide audience on the same weekend. Beyond that, the cast of "Birdman" is an entirely homogeneous group of white people and the cast of "Beyond the Lights," aside from Minnie Driver, are black. Both however, do share a common bond: Show business.

"Birdman" tells the story of Riggan Thompson, a Hollywood action hero, star of the comic book franchise "Birdman," who longs to be taken seriously as the kind of actor starring on Broadway. Riggan has decided to mount his own production of a play by Raymond Carver, a playwright who meant a great deal to Thompson when he was an aspiring actor in college. Unfortunately, the adaptation, by Riggan himself, is troubled. His co-star is a dope, and Riggan himself is coming apart at the seams.

When the dope Riggan can't stand gets injured, he replaces him with a Broadway veteran named Mike Shiner (Edward Norton), who immediately begins to improve the play … until he doesn't. Mike's “process” soon causes new headaches for the already-on-edge Riggan. Riggan has begun to hear the voice of his former comic book character “Birdman” as a running commentary about his various failures and shortcomings as an actor and a human being, all points underlined by Riggan's daughter, Sam (Emma Stone), his new assistant. Sam is a walking, talking, breathing symbol of Riggan's many failures as a father, husband and human being.



In "Beyond the Lights" Gugu Mbatha-Raw stars as Noni, a Rihanna-like rising pop star who, as we meet her, has just won a Billboard award and is in the midst of a mild breakdown. Never having been much of a drinker, Noni hits the bottle hard, ditches her hangers-on and heads to her hotel in an attempt to end it all. Noni's mother/manager Macy Jean (Minnie Driver) arrives in time to see Noni perched precariously on her hotel balcony. She calls on a cop, Kaz (Nate Parker), working security for Noni on this night, and he manages to save her life.

From there, "Beyond the Lights" becomes a rather conventional romance, nothing remotely to compare with the high-wire act that is "Birdman." But the scenes of Noni's arrival backstage at the Billboard Awards, being poked and prodded, fussed and positioned are shot in such a way that they are completely disorienting, much like the entirety of "Birdman." One moment in particular stands out as an example of the warped nature of fame: As Noni is called upon to sign autographs, numerous fans shout “I love you!” and one particularly intense male fan seems to really want Noni to know how much he cares for her.

The scene isn't played as if the fan is a stalker or even a real danger, but it lingers long enough to settle on a question I've always had about fans: What exactly is their end game? Watch "A Hard Day's Night" and recall the fans that chase The Beatles down the streets of London and ask yourself what happens if they catch them? What then? What is it that these fans intend to do with their favorite stars? Sex? Love? Now imagine you're Noni. What is expected of you here? To complete the life of some stranger? To exist as some purely sexual fantasy?

It's really no wonder that Noni ends up on that balcony or that she comes to view Kaz as a savior; projecting onto him some of the same warped fantasy that has been projected upon her. That he happens to be real, stable and capable of understanding what Noni is attempting to communicate to him through her warped side of everyday life is part fantasy and part romance. But it works in the film because Mbatha-Raw and Parker make it work.

The warping in 'Birdman' is similarly tragic. While New York City gives Riggan Thompson slightly more anonymity than Los Angeles and Hollywood give to Noni, he still finds bizarre, surreal moments of fan interaction. For example, he is locked out of his theater in his tighty whities and marches, arms akimbo, around to the front of the theater trailed by fans. He narrowly navigates what may be a typical Broadway scene filled with characters and fans with cell phones who will capture every moment of his public humiliation.

Noni's humiliation in "Beyond the Lights" is also public. When a performance at the BET Awards turns into a real-life fight with a former boyfriend, Kaz rushes the stage to protect her with predictable results in the social media world. For both Riggan and Noni their viral moment is warping and weirdly positive. Riggan is feted for his commitment to finishing his scene at the cost of his dignity and Noni is able to get her record company behind her first album because she is now the name on everyone's lips, regardless of whether her music is any good.

Part of the wonder of both "Birdman" and "Beyond the Lights" is whether indeed the art in question is good or bad. We only get glimpses of each. In "Birdman" we see one intense scene between Riggan and Mike, and it contains fireworks. Norton and Keaton spark brilliantly off of each other, bouncing from script to direction to editing the script to reworking the scene in an extraordinarily tight close up that ratchets up the tension and excitement of this moment of creation. It's a remarkable scene that made me wish one of the Blu-Ray extras would be the play itself performed in full.

In "Beyond the Lights" the moment is less pronounced. Noni performs an a capella version of Nina Simone's "Black Bird" at a karaoke bar on a quiet Caribbean vacation with Kaz. To this point we know she's talented but we don't quite know how much of her talent is the smoke and mirrors or the work of her svengali-like mother. When Mbatha-Raw lets loose and the tears flow  the words of the song reflect her feelings. We are immediately informed of Noni's true talent; it only underlines what a farce her life has become.

There is something to be said of Macy in "Beyond the Lights" and of Zach Galifianakis's Jake in "Birdman." Both seem to care about the people whose lives they coddle and create. Macy has been stage managing Noni's life for years; imagine being born to Simon Cowell crossed with the ambition of an army general staging a battle plan. Jake is more shifty and reactive. He knows Riggan is his meal ticket but he seems to care a little about Riggan the person. Jake, at the very least, is supportive of Riggan's attempt to put on the play; Macy won't even listen to the songs Noni has written for herself.

But then, Riggan and Noni are at very different points of their famous lives. The celebrity bubble has encompassed Riggan for more than 30 years.  Jake is a step on the evolutionary ladder of fame. The first step is a svengali like Macy. She's typically followed by a well-meaning friend or simpering family member who is entirely overwhelmed but not unhelpful. And finally, for the truly successful there is a toady stage where Jake appears to support every idiot whim of his charge even as he hopes to push for something with a bigger financial payoff.

Noni can still avoid the fate of Riggan Thompson, trapped in his cocoon of fame and raging against the dying of his fame's light. Noni has Kaz to keep her grounded and loved, but there is trouble there too, in a strange way.  Noni's "Black Bird" only came from a place of heartache just as Riggan's "What We Talk About When We Talk About Love" comes from a place of desperation. Should Noni choose to remain grounded with Kaz, can her contentment remain artistically relevant?

And that is a pretty good reflection of the warped nature of fame. We wish our stars well but when they get happy and begin to produce work that reflects a life of contentment we likely aren't all that interested. Where is the pain, where are the tears, where is the sweat? We've loved these people as they described their struggle to us through their art but now they are happy and content and we're still where we always were. Noni could walk off the stage at the end of "Beyond the Lights" and never be heard from again and still be happy.

Riggan Thompson doesn't have that choice and thus we arrive at the end of "Birdman" and the voice that's been driving Riggan, the voice of 'Birdman' that has pushed him to nearly take his own life on stage, which has now driven him out a window to attempt to fly. For Riggan, contentment could only come in death. There was no Kaz there to see him and remind him that the real world existed in some form beyond the warped world of fame. No, death was the only way for Riggan to find peace and as I ponder the ending of "Birdman" I can't help but feel that the contentment of death was the only true way for the film to end. 

Ah, but is that how "Birdman" ended? With Riggan's death? I think so. The film has followed a course of fantasy throughout with Riggan's odd visions of Birdman and his running DVD commentary on Riggan's life. We have flown over the streets of New York City in a flight of fancy and watched Riggan make bombs explode and armies erupt from nowhere but these were merely his deluded visions.

The end of "Birdman" offers another brief bit of fantasy as Sam looks out the window and seems to see her father flying as we'd seen him in fantasy before. My preference however, is to believe that Sam saw her father's truth; that with all that had driven him mad for so long, only death was left for him, for his chance to finally rest and reconcile. There was no more blood to leave on stage, he'd vanquished his theater enemies, Mike and a theater critic played by Lindsay Duncan. And yet, he'd forever be "Birdman," a star who forever would be remembered for his success.

Riggan was fully warped by his fame. There was no Kaz for him and thus no turning back. His triumph was all that was left and he took that when he took the bullet to the nose on stage and left the audience wanting more blood. In Riggan's warped worldview there was nothing left. The cycle of fame had finally come to end with him having achieved all that he ever wanted: one beautiful moment of being taken seriously.

Riggan's death and Noni's life reflect us in the audience and what we've come to demand of our stars. Blood, sweat and tears. While we are blameless in how Riggan Thompson chooses to live his life it was the cycle that we abetted that led to his madness. Noni would be Riggan if she weren't so young and with such possibilities left in her life. It takes a police officer, a symbol of stability and safety to rescue Noni from fame and while it's hard to believe that Noni walked away from it all at the end, I'd like to believe that music became secondary to life after the lights faded and Noni found contentment if not success.

I wrote this article before I saw the movie "Whiplash" in which an abusive svengali, far more monstrous than Macy, drove Miles Teller's Andrew to a moment of sheer, unconscious, rapturous success. That movie made me glad that Andrew eschewed contentment in favor or greatness in the same way that Riggan Thompson was willing to give up life for one great performance.

Would Macy's machinations be worth more if Noni were a truly transcendent talent? That's not the movie that "Beyond the Lights" intends to be and I can't judge it as such. I can say that Noni isn't so talented that I'm sad she might choose contentment over fame; I would be disappointed if Andrew or Riggan made the same choice. I guess that's how fame has warped me.

The only things that the movies "Birdman" and "Beyond the Lights" have in common are that they are both movies and they both were released to a wide audience on the same weekend. Beyond that, the cast of "Birdman" is an entirely homogeneous group of white people and the cast of "Beyond the Lights," aside from Minnie Driver, are black. Both however, do share a common bond in show business. 

"Birdman" tells the story of Riggan Thompson, a Hollywood action hero, star of the comic book franchise "Birdman," who longs for the being taken seriously that comes in starring on Broadway. Riggan has decided to mount his own production of a play by Raymond Carver, a playwright who meant a great deal to Thompson when he was an aspiring actor in college. Unfortunately, the adaptation by Riggan himself is troubled. His co-lead actor is a dope and Riggan himself is coming apart at the seams. 

When the dope Riggan can't stand gets injured he replaces him with a Broadway veteran named Mike Shiner (Edward Norton) who immediately begins to improve the play until he doesn't. Mike's 'process' soon causes new headaches for the already on edge Riggan who's begun to hear the voice of his former comic book character 'Birdman' as a running commentary about his various failures and shortcomings an actor and a human being; points underlined by the inclusion of Riggan's daughter Sam (Emma Stone) as his new assistant. Sam is a walking, talking, breathing symbol of Riggan's many failures as a father, husband and human being. 

In "Beyond the Lights" Gugu Mbatha-Raw stars as Noni, a Rihanna like rising pop star who, as we meet her, has just won a Billboard award and is in the midst of a mild breakdown. Never having been much of a drinker, Noni hits the bottle hard, ditches her hangers on and heads to her hotel in an attempt to end it all. Noni's mother/manager Macy Jean (Minnie Driver) arrives only in time to see Noni perched precariously on her hotel balcony and calls on a cop, Kaz (Nate Parker), working security for Noni on this night, and he manages to just save her life. 

From there, "Beyond the Lights" becomes a rather conventional romance, nothing remotely to compare with the mindfuck that is "Birdman." But, the scenes of Noni's arrival backstage at the Billboard Awards, walking through the backstage, being poked and prodded, fussed and positioned are shot in such a way that they are completely disorienting, much like the entirety of "Birdman." One moment in particular stands out as an example of the warped nature of fame as Noni is called upon to sign autographs, numerous fans shout I love you and one particularly intense male fan seems to really want Noni to know how much he cares for her. 

The scene isn't played as if the fan is a stalker or even a real danger but it lingers long enough to settle on a question I've always had about fans: What exactly is your endgame? Watch "A Hard Day's Night" and recall the fans that chase The Beatles down the streets of London and ask yourself what happens if they catch them? What then? What is it that these fans intend with their favorite stars? Sex? Love? Fame? Now imagine you're Noni, what is expected of you here? To complete the life of some stranger? To exist as some purely sexual fantasy? 

It's really no wonder that Noni ends up on that balcony or that she comes to view Kaz as a savior; projecting onto him some of the same warped fantasy that has been projected upon her. That he happens to be real and stable and capable of understanding what Noni is attempting to communicate to him through her warped side of everyday life is part fantasy and part romance but it works in the film because Mbatha-Raw and Parker make it work. 

The warping in 'Birdman' is similarly tragic. While New York City gives Riggan Thompson slightly more anonymity than Los Angeles and Hollywood gives to Noni, he still finds bizarre, surreal moments of fan interaction such as when he is locked out of his theater in his tighty whities and marches arms akimbo around to the front of the theater trailed by fans and narrowly navigating what may be a typically Broadway scene filled with characters and of course fans with cellphones who will capture every moment of his humiliation. 

Noni's humiliation in "Beyond the Lights" is also public. When a performance at the BET Awards turns into a real life fight with a former boyfriend, Kaz rushes the stage to protect her with predictable results in the social media world. For both Riggan and Noni their viral moment is warping and weirdly positive. Riggan is feted for his commitment to finishing his scene at the cost of his dignity and Noni is able to get her record company behind her first album because she is now the name on everyone's lips, regardless of whether her music is any good. 

Part of the wonder of both "Birdman" and "Beyond the Lights" is whether indeed the art in question is good or bad. We only really get glimpses of each. In "Birdman" we see one truly intense scene between Riggan and Mike and it contains fireworks. Norton and Keaton spark brilliantly off of each bouncing from script to direction to editing the script to reworking the scene in an extraordinarily tight close up that ratchets up the tension and excitement of this moment of creation. It's a remarkable scene that made me wish one of the Blu-Ray extras would be the play itself performed in full. 

In "Beyond the Lights" the moment is less pronounced. Noni performs an A Capella version of Nina Simone's "Black Bird" at a karaoke bar on a quiet Caribbean vacation with Kaz. To this point we know she's talented but we don't quite know how much of her talent is the smoke and mirrors work of her svengali mother Macy. When Mbatha-Raw lets loose and the tears flow and the words of the song illustrate her feelings we are immediately informed of Noni's true talent and it only underlines what a shame her life has been so far. 

There is something to be said of Macy in "Beyond the Lights'' and of Zach Galifianakis's Jake in "Birdman." Both seem to care about the people whose lives they coddle and create. Macy has been stage managing Noni's life for years; imagine being born to Simon Cowell crossed with the ambition of an Army General staging a battle plan. Jake is more shifty and reactive. He knows Riggan is his meal ticket but he seems to care a little about Riggan the person. Jake, at the very least, is supportive of Riggan's attempt to put on the play; Macy won't even listen to the songs Noni has written for herself. 

But then, Riggan and Noni are at very different times of their fame. For Riggan, the celebrity bubble has encompassed him for over 30 years. Jake is a step on the evolutionary ladder of fame that begins with an early svengali, like a Macy, and graduates to a caring friend or simpering family member for it reaches a toady stage where Jake appears to support every idiot whim of his charge even as he hopes to push for something with a bigger financial payoff. 

Noni can still avoid the fate of Riggan Thompson, trapped in his cocoon of fame and raging against the dying of his fame's light. Noni has Kaz to keep her grounded and loved but there is trouble there too, in a strange way. You see, great art does not come from contentment. Noni's "Black Bird" only came from a place of heartache just as Riggan's "What We Talk About When We Talk About Love" comes from a place of desperation. Being happy and content is seemingly what we all want but it is generally the death knell of artistry. 

And that is a pretty good reflection of the warped nature of fame. We wish well upon our stars but when they get happy and begin to produce work that reflects a life of contentment we likely aren't all that interested. Where is the pain, where are the tears, where is the sweat. We've loved these people as they described their struggle to us through their art but now they are happy and content and we're still where we always were. Noni might be better off walking off stage in England at the end of "Beyond the Lights" and never getting back on stage. Take your contentment Noni and just go home. 

Riggan Thompson doesn't have that choice and thus we arrive at the end of "Birdman" and the voice that's been driving Riggan, the voice of 'Birdman' that has pushed him to nearly take his own life on stage has now driven him out a window to attempt to fly. For Riggan, contentment could only come in death. There was no Kaz there to see him and remind him that the real world existed in some form beyond the warped world of fame. No, death was the only way for Riggan to find peace and as I ponder the ending of "Birdman" I can't help but feel that the contentment of death was the only true way for the film to end. 

Essay On 39 Movies for 39 Years

I turn 39 years old this week and as birthdays tend to put many of us in a reflective mood, I am reflecting. My life has been defined by my love of movies and so I decided to look back on 39 movies that have shaped who I am as a person. They are in no specific order other than how they simply occurred to me and the moments of my life that they evoke.

1. The Big Lebowski: It takes three viewings of “The Big Lebowski” before it dawns on you how brilliant the movie is. The looping dialogue, the odd characterizations, the way Jeff Bridges as The Dude comes into being by adopting the ideas and dialogue of those around him as a coping mechanism for a world he no longer understands, it’s a remarkably complex work that couches itself as a stoner comedy. Few films so well demonstrate the infinite ways that subtle character choices can define the way a story is told. I learn something new each time I watch “The Big Lebowski.”

2. “Casablanca:” Obvious choice, I know, but when I was a younger man forcing myself to watch classics in order to justify my choice to become a film critic, “Casablanca” was the movie that rewarded that choice. The history of the Hollywood studio system is woven through every inch of “Casablanca” from it’s modest origins as just another Hollywood ‘programmer,’ a film made on a movie assembly line by a workman like director, Michael Curtiz, who happened to a genius well ahead of his time, to the casting of Bogart and Ingrid Bergman that almost never happened and then became iconic. “Casablanca” teaches us more about the history of Hollywood than any single film Hollywood ever produced.

3. “Summer of Sam:” I have taken so many incredible lessons away from watching “Summer of Sam.” The most important of those lessons has been how singular the experience of a movie can be. For me, “Summer of Sam” is an epic masterpiece of energy, excitement and film construction. For most other viewers, “Summer of Sam” is a forgettable genre piece from a filmmaker who is more personality and flair than auteur.

4. “Memento:” What is possible in a movie? “Memento” showed me something I had never seen before, a narrative in reverse. It wasn’t new to fans of experimental film-making but for me it was a powerful revelation about what an artist could do with structure, with editing and with great acting. Christopher Nolan willfully risks confusing the audience to the point of frustration and that makes the film provocative. Beyond the provocation however, is a taut, narrative thriller that is as inventive as it is deeply compelling.

5. “Citizen Kane:” What student of movies hasn’t had the “Citizen Kane” experience. Watching “Citizen Kane” remains a rite of passage for movie lovers and what better legacy could a film possibly have.

6. “The Talented Mr. Ripley:” There was a time in my life when I was a strict, black or white student of the law. I saw no gray areas and gave no quarter to those who stepped out of line. What an extraordinary experience it was then for me to see “The Talented Mr. Ripley” and find the structure of my beliefs, my very morality turned on its head as I found myself rooting for the murderous Tom Ripley to win the life he so desperately wants. Matt Damon compelled me so deeply that the film snuck past my moral radar and messed with my sense of self. That’s quite an experience.

7. “Star Wars:” As a child there is nothing greater in the world than seeing your dream come to life before you. That was “Star Wars” for me. I dreamed of “Star Wars” while playing with the toys and then watched my toys come to life on screen. To this day “Star Wars” makes me feel like a child filled with wonder and amazement.

8. “Elizabethtown:” This movie is exceptionally personal to me. It was the first time that I didn’t connect with a Cameron Crowe movie and I was devastated. Then, I fell in love with a woman who loved the movie and she made me look at it in a new way. I still have my qualms with “Elizabethtown” but the bond the film built with this woman who is still an extraordinary part of my life today makes the film the film an important milestone of my 39 years.

9. “No Country for Old Men:” My gut was wrenched, I was sweating in my seat. My heart was pulled and tugged from beginning to end as I searched for the light at the end of the tunnel and found only the angry, desperate despair that is the heart of “No Country for Old Men.” Few films have ever had as powerful an effect on me from beginning to end as “No Country for Old Men” still has.

10. “Amadeus:” This is a fairly recent revelation. Even as I have long appreciated “Amadeus” it wasn’t until I revisited the film just last year for I Hate Critics that I realized that movies don’t change but we do. As a more mature and thoughtful man I looked at “Amadeus” with new eyes and found a remarkable masterpiece.

11. “Almost Famous:” The power an actor or actress can have over an audience is a remarkable thing and for me that is no better demonstrated than in Kate Hudson’s performance in “Almost Famous.” While her beauty is the initial impact, Hudson’s humanity, youth and frailty, come to be her defining and compelling characteristics. I can think of few more emotional moments watching a movie than the way Hudson attempts to deflect her despair at learning the man she loved had attempted to trade her for a case of beer. In just a look, a slight shimmer of tears in her eyes, Hudson devastates us as an audience.

12. “Waitress:” This film has an extra power it should not have. Director Adrienne Shelly was murdered not long after the release of the movie and what was the announcement of a brilliant new voice in American movies became the most tender and loving epitaph any filmmaker could ever have.

13. “Once:” True love can be found and still not be meant to be. Sometimes we sacrifice what we want, what we desire, even what we love in order for the betterment of other others. That may not have been the overall intent of “Once” but it was the lesson I came away with and it has stuck with me for years.

14. “The Tree of Life:” Terence Malick is the best visual storyteller in film history. His images are more moving than any line of dialogue ever could be. The visual journey he creates for “The Tree of Life” is a rollercoaster ride through the history and evolution of humanity.

15. “Lady in the Water:” M. Night Shyamalan set out to make a fairy tale about a mermaid and wound up making a confounding film containing some of his worst instincts as a storyteller. But, as I told a fellow film critic immediately after the movie was over, Shyamalan “Hung his balls out there.” Say what you will about how bad “Lady in the Water” truly is, the film has more ambition than any 10 modern movies.

16. “Clerks:” I once tried to show “Clerks” in a class at college and wound up shunned by most of the class. They were put off by the raunchy dialogue and low budget look of the film. Yes, “Clerks” was another revelation about individual tastes in movies but it was also a lesson in how I choose my friends and measure out how much of myself I’m willing to share with other people.

17. “Pulp Fiction:” As “Citizen Kane” is the ancient rite of passage for movie lovers, “Pulp Fiction” continues to evolve into the more modern rite of passage. A film of such incredible invention, “Pulp Fiction” continues to teach me about movies each time I watch it, with lessons in physical filmmaking and in dialogue.

18. “Amelie:” My first foreign love,”Amelie” gave me the courage and curiosity to pursue the works of Truffaut, Renais, and Godard. Without falling in love with “Amelie” my film education would have forever remained incomplete.

19. “Annie Hall:” As a kid from the Midwest I’m told that I should not be able to relate to Woody Allen. He’s too New York, too Jewish, for someone like me to relate to. And yet, with his fumbling and longing and his extraordinary sense of humor, I find no other filmmaker on the planet that speaks to me the way Woody Allen does.

20. “Things Behind the Sun:” The film is entirely forgotten within the mass of our popular culture but it still means the world to me. “Things Behind the Sun” moved me in ways I had never been moved before. It’s the story of a rape victim being interviewed by a boy who had been coaxed and bullied into being part of her rape. The power of this film can only experienced by seeing it for yourself. Me, I was forever changed by it.

21. “Jerry Maguire:” The reputation of “Jerry Maguire” hasn’t exactly grown over the years with people’s ever changing perceptions of both Tom Cruise and director Cameron Crowe. But, for me, the experience of the film has never changed. I am enchanted by every moment of “Jerry Maguire,” yes even “You complete me.”

22. “The Dark Knight Rises:” Why not say “The Dark Knight” you wonder? Why would you choose the seemingly lesser sequel? Because “The Dark Knight Rises” gave rise to the I Hate Critics podcast and a pair of new life long friendships that I never would have had without it.

23. “Bowling for Columbine:” I used to be a conservative Republican. Then I saw “Bowling for Columbine” which led me to “Roger &  Me” and then “Fahrenheit 9/11″ and a complete rearranging of my political thought process. Say what you will about Michael Moore, his work rings with humor and a deep seated compassion for all and that is what changed in me after “Bowling for Columbine.”

24. “Les Miserables:” I have never had a more emotional reaction to a movie. The scene where the priest rescues Jean Valjean and gives him all of the silver he was intending to steal so that Valjean could build a new life devastates me every time. I’m not remotely religious in my life but the power of the line “I’ve saved your soul for God” compels me deeply. There is so much compassion in that moment and that compassion radiates throughout the rest of the film.

25. “The Princess Bride:” Seemingly no one of my generation can escape the influence of “The Princess Bride.”

26. “Legally Blonde:” Too this day, I don’t know if I have seen a movie as genuinely joyous as “Legally Blonde.” Not kidding, whenever I am feeling truly despondent, I watch “Legally Blonde” because I find it impossible to be unhappy when I watch this movie.

27. “Hedwig and the Angry Inch:” A compelling story of gender identity, love, and the power of pure rock n’roll, “Hedwig and the Angry Inch” forced me to confront childish biases I held against people who were different from me and helped me find common ground I had failed to recognize before.

28. “Waking Life:” In the entirety of my 39 years I have never used illegal drugs of any kind. I would like to imagine however if I did use an illegal drug the world of “Waking Life” would be my ideal trip.

29. “Magnolia:” Like “Les Miserables,” “Magnolia” is one of those deeply moving movie moments. When the cast combines with the music of Amy Mann its a moment of such incredible catharsis that I can’t help but cry.

30. “Seven:” My first great shock at the movies. I had seen twists before, but that head in the box and knowing that evil had unexpectedly and shockingly triumphed over good was so incredibly profound for me.

31. “Beyond the Mat:” One must weigh their empty thrills against the human cost of thoses thrills. That was the lesson for me from the documentary “Beyond the Mat.” A longtime fan of professional wrestling, I had long regarded it as a meaningless, empty thrill. “Beyond the Mat” was a revelation about the cost of what I thought was free of any cost. Yes, wrestling is scripted and its just entertainment but there are real people involved and real stakes in their lives and while I knew that on a deeper level I wasn’t forced to confront my own empty enjoyment until I saw “Beyond the Mat.”

32. “Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back:” Where the original “Star Wars” still makes me feel like a little kid, “Empire” still feels like my first transition toward adulthood. Sure, I saw it when I was quite young but it brought about a revelation about tragedy and a hero’s journey that helped shape me as a critical thinker. Luke Skywalker is forced to come to terms with his father being the face of evil in the universe, Han Solo is captured and seemingly killed, the Empire stands tall. It’s greek tragedy at work here and it was unlike anything my young mind had experienced up to that time.

33. “The Pledge:” How does one compartmentalize the evils of the world and if you can’t compartmentalize or somehow come to terms with tragedy and failing what will it do to you as a person. “The Pledge” offers a full examination of this idea and forces its audience into the uncomfortable position of a confronting our apathy toward evil.

34. “Mulholland Drive:” I am, generally speaking, not the biggest fan of David Lynch and his surrealist take on movies. That said, I have had few experiences quite like “Mulholland Drive.” Watching the film was a formative experience for the young film critic in me who could not help but intellectually claw at the various knots that Lynch ties into this extraordinarily complex narrative. I can’t say I untied many of those knots but I never stopped trying.

35. “Nurse Betty:” One of the great forgotten movies of the past two decades, “Nurse Betty” features Neil Labute at his nastiest and his most gentle. The film is violent and graphic in some moments and yet contains the ability to be warm and gentle as a great romantic comedy in other moments. The gentle and sensitive way that Morgan Freeman allows himself to fall for Renee Zellweger’s Betty without ever meeting her moves me deeply and his hurt in the end when she isn’t who he wanted her to be is profoundly moving and instructive for anyone who’s ever built a fantasy around someone else.

36. “Chasing Amy:” My first “these characters talk like I do” experience at the movies. I recognized the characters of “Chasing Amy” in my own life and related to them like friends. Naturally, this made the experience of the film all the more powerful, memorable and shaping.

37. “A Serious Man:”  I fought “A Serious Man” as I watched it. I wanted something funny, I wanted something with a star I could relate to. Instead, I got a stubborn, narratively thick, very Jewish story of a Jobian character constantly the victim of life’s many unfair twists of fate. It took me half the movie to come around to it but once I did I found myself putting the pieces of the film together into one of the richest moviegoing experiences of my life. That ending, so out of left field, so abrupt, and yet so perfect. The film could not have ended in any other way and that revelation has stuck with me.

38. “Diehard:” Its about connection. For guys, emotions can be difficult to express. How do we bond with other men without it being awkward or uncomfortable. What if we don’t like the same sports teams? “Diehard” has been the ground floor of a few friendships I have developed over the years. There is something about this silly, well constructed action epic that makes it widely relatable to a disparate band of people. It’s not just men either, I know many women who love “Diehard” just as much. But as a shaping experience of my moviegoing life, “Diehard” is a touchstone of male bonding unlike any other part of my life.

39. “E.T:” The first movie of my life. My brother Chuck took me to see “E.T” in the movie theater when I was 5 years old. I have never forgotten the experience and I never will.

Movie Review: The Stepfather

The Stepfather (2009) 

Directed by Nelson McCormick 

Written by J. S Cardone

Starring Dylan Walsh, Sela Ward, Penn Badgley, Amber Heard, Jon Tenney 

Release Date October 16th, 2009 

Published October 17th, 2009

Must we suffer more unnecessary remakes? Ugh. With a paucity of original ideas Hollywood has been mining its history, good and bad, for movies to revamp, re-imagine and re-engineer in hopes of shaking loose a few dollars from a mass audience that likely wasn't alive or aware whent the original movie was created.

The latest case in point is The Stepfather, a remake of an exceptionally lame horror thriller about a shady creep who murders the families that take him in as a step-daddy. The 1988 movie, at the very least, had the kink of an previously unexplored premise, step-dad as psycho killer. The new film is but a shadow reflecting the ultimate lameness of the original, minus the kink.

Penn Badgely, the hard bodied star of the CW Network's Gossip Girl takes the good guy role in The Stepfather as wayward black sheep Michael. Having just returned from military school for some unseen acting out, Michael finds his family has changed. Where once his father was is now David Harris (Dylan Walsh).

David hooked up with Michael's mom Susan (Sela Ward) one day in the grocery store. Their courtship was so quick that Michael wasn't gone a semester before wedding plans began. Not that Michael cared where his father went, Jay Harding (Jon Tenney) was a cheater and given the boot about the time Michael was sent to military school.

David is, at first, an exceptionally corny and overly welcoming presence in the house. However, once Michael and other begin to probe about his past David goes from cornball to creep. Soon bodies begin to pile up and Michael has to find some way to stop the psycho from making his family the latest in a series of family victims.

As loathsome as The Stepfather is there is some terrifically off-beat work by “Nip Tuck” actor Dylan Walsh. The ways in which he forces David's normalcy on others is at once tense and humorous. His secret glowering and tics become something of a dark, inside joke between him and the audience.

Sadly, little else in The Stepfather captures that off-beat spirit. Director Nelson McCormick hues closely to the formula right down to the inevitable rain soaked battle for survival between the besieged family and the family psycho-path. The ending is typical horror kitsch right down to the knowing wink.

The Stepfather is as dopey as you would expect. You really had no reason to see the 1988 original. There is less reason to see this unremarkable remake.

Movie Review: The Weather Man

The Weather Man (2005) 

Directed by Gore Verbinski 

Written by Steve Conrad 

Starring Nicolas Cage, Michael Caine, Hope Davis, Michael Rispoli 

Release Date October 28th, 2005 

Published October 28th, 2005 

It is only very recently that I have become a big Nicolas Cage fan. I loved his Oscar winning work in Leaving Las Vegas but his subsequent descent into action stardom was marred by some seriously awful work in Con Air, The Rock, 8mm and Gone In 60 Seconds. He won me back a little with his extraordinary work in Scorsese's Bringing Out The Dead but that was almost forgotten in the midst of Cage's weepy period with City of Angels, Family Man and Captain Corelli's Mandolin.

Right now, however, Cage has hit a stride that is remarkable. Pushing aside the subpar blockbuster National Treasure, Cage's run of Adaptation, Matchstick Men, Lord of War and now The Weather Man is one of the greatest series of performances by one actor in movie history. Forget the bad box office, when Cage is teamed with great people and great material there may not be a better actor working today.

Dave Spritz (Nicolas Cage) is Chicago's number one weather man. His 'Spritz nipper' has fans across the windy city stopping him on the street to ask him which will be the chilliest day of the week. Of course not everyone is a fan of Dave's. On more than one occasion Dave has found himself on the wrong side of some flying food items including a shake, a box of McNuggets, even a burrito.

Dave attributes the food throwing to the fact that he is paid a lot of money to do a job that is not that difficult. He is paid high six figures plus appearance fees, works two hours a day and did not even have to get a degree in meteorology. The food items are essentially karmic payback for a way too easy path through life, and, more to the point, a reaction to how often Dave simply gets it wrong weatherwise.

Dave is a serious case of arrested development. He has never really accomplished anything. His father, Robert (Michael Caine), on the other hand, is a Pulitzer prize winning novelist and a wonderful father to boot despite the fact that his son is a very obvious disappointment. Dave also wrote a novel although, like most everything else in his life, he never followed through with it.

Most disappointing about Dave is his family situation. Dave is divorced from his wife, Noreen (Hope Davis), and cannot seem to connect with his two children, sixteen year-old Mike (Nicholas Hoult) and eleven year-old daugter Shelly (Gemmenne de la Pena). Mike has recently been busted for smoking pot and Shelly has taken up cigarrettes. 

Dave is convinced he can turn the whole thing around with a new job on a national morning television show in New York. He had better act quickly, however, because his father is dying and his wife is preparing to marry another man. His kids' problems are even more disturbing but best left to your discovery in watching the movie.

If Dave Spritz's life sounds depressing, well that's because it really is depressing. The Weather Man, directed by Gore Verbinski, makes no pretense about the level of sadness in its story. Dave is a pathetic character, a wretched failure as a husband and father and a son. He is a narcissus cloaked in his own misery. Still, as played by Cage, Dave Spritz is fascinating to watch.

Cage's chameleonesque ability to melt into his characters is perfectly on display in The Weather Man. Even minor touches like his ease in front of a green screen doing the weather are really convincing. His near meltdowns are a tour de force of wonderfully acted inner turmoil. Dave's plastic surface seems ready to melt from the heat of his inner conflict and that is Nicolas Cage at his absolute best.

Gore Verbinski intrigues me. While I found both Mousehunt and The Mexican to be underwhelming, The Ring was visually accomplished and Pirates of The Carribean showed the potential of a mainstream movie to exceed the limitations of its genre and be both entertaining and artistically crafted.

The Weather Man is yet another step forward in Gore Verbinski's evolution into maybe becoming a very rare kind of director, a mainstream 'auteur'. Watch the way in which his camera observes Dave without engaging him. The audience, like rubberneckers at a crash site, seem to watch Dave's sad life unfold in a slow motion drive by and we cannot turn away. Here's hoping Verbinski does not get too caught up in the Pirates sequels and forgets to make more films as engrossing as The Weather Man.

The film's trailer might give people the impression that The Weather Man is a drama with comedy. There are laughs in the film but they come from a very dark place. They come from failure, humiliation and pain, and the sorrowful ways that Cage's character deals with what happens to him and around him. Dave Spritz is a sad sack character who invites indignity and cannot seem to escape it.

So if the film is as dark as I describe, it begs the question; why did I like it so much? Because it sets out to create a portrait of a particular character and no matter how dark things get the film stays true to that character and tells his story in a most compelling fashion. I liked it because Nicolas Cage is so amazing, to simplify things.

Cage deserves an Oscar nomination for his extraordinary work in The Weather Man. That, however, does not mean that the film is typically entertaining. Some people will have to change the way they look at movies to find pleasure in this film. The movie is challengingly dark and uncompromising in its grim gray look and attitude.

For fans of complicated, interesting movies that ask you to invest yourself heavily in one character The Weather Man is what you are looking for. For the average moviegoer this may not be your cup of tea. The Weather Man is not an easy film to like but, if you are up for it, you will be rewarded with yet another performance by Nicolas Cage that establishes him as arguably the most uniquely talented actor working today.

Movie Review The Girlfriend Experience

The Girlfriend Experience (2009) 

Directed by Steven Soderbergh

Written by Brian Koppelman, David Levien 

Starring Sasha Grey, Chris Santos, Glenn Kenny 

Release Date May 22nd, 2009 

Published July 15th, 2009 

For some directors prolific means 2 films in 3 years. For Steven Soderbergh 2 films in one year is par for the course. In 2009 he knocked out The Girlfriend Experience and The Informant! in under 9 months time. Not merely prolific however is Mr. Soderbergh. Both films are absolutely brilliant.

Real life adult film star Sascha Grey stars in The Girlfriend Experience as Chelsea or is she Christine? She is a high class hooker who for a couple thousand dollars does not merely sleep with a client but gives them the experience of having a girlfriend, minus the inherent ups and downs.

Christine/Chelsea has a boyfriend, Chris (Chris Santos) who rather than living a lie with her is fully aware of what she does. He's not exactly cool with it but has accepted a life with some very unique boundaries. They talk like a normal couple, even bitching about their work lives.

Then Christine meets David (David Levien). He's a screenwriter but, more important to Christine/Chelsea, he has an astrological sign that lines up with hers. As they chat and talk turns to getting together they bond and Christine/Chelsea seems like she may be crossing the line between her business and her real life.

That is the linear plot that I drew out of the film. Director Soderbergh however keeps us off balance by mixing the timeline and not telling us he's doing it. No cards, no dates, just a few verbal clues here and there to let us know where and when we are in the story. The approach is hypnotic and engaging.

Sascha Grey is a fascinating actress who, with the freedom of Soderbergh's improv style, brings a real, flesh and blood freshness to a character that in the hands of a more trained actress might become a more noticeable performance. She has a hard one comfort on screen that comes from her unique background.

Soderbergh's use of Digital Photography is head and shoulders beyond any other director. Too often Digital becomes shaky and unwatchable. In other films it becomes a device that sticks out. With Soderbergh the camera melts away and you feel as if you are in the room having these experiences. A fly on the wall or as a ghost in the room.

The Girlfriend Experience is a revelation. Combined with the wildly different The Informant! it announces Soderbergh as arguably the auteur of this time. His work rate combined with his artistry is like nothing we've seen before.

Movie Review: Undiscovered

Undiscovered (2005) 

Directed by Meiert Avis 

Written by John Galt 

Starring Pell James, Steven Strait, Kip Pardue, Shannyn Sossamon, Carrie Fisher

Release Date August 25th, 2005 

Published August 26th, 2005 

I have a theory about this ridiculous slump business at the box office. It is not merely that Hollywood is not making films that people want to see. Rather it is Hollywood releasing films so unwatchable that they poison the theaters that show them with a toxin that drives audiences to their homes in fear of ever returning to a movie theater.

Consider the evidence; Are We There Yet?, The Pacifier, Deuce Bigelow 2. Just typing those titles raised the bile from my stomach. Now in theaters is a film that is far worse than any of the films I mentioned. An abysmal teen rock romance called Undiscovered that should have remained Un-released.

Steven Strait's earnest pronouncements of love and heartbreak are so pathetic that realistically he would be more inclined toward a restraining order than for true love. The one-two punch of Mr. Strait's uninspired delivery and the script's stultifying dialogue is just brutal. I am told that  Strait performed all of his own music in the film and given our current music culture, his music will fit in nicely next to all of the atrocious examples of mainstream pop rock that overflows from most top 40 radio stations.

A music critic friend told me recently that modern rockers have started to go away from writing complex lyrics. Supposedly they want the focus on musicianship, but as the recent MTV Video Music Awards show, it's about projecting rock star image more than having anything to genuinely do with music. By that standard Mr. Strait, a former model, should fit right in. How unfortunate, however, that as his character is written, he's supposed to be a great songwriter. Yeah... not quite.

For her part Ms. James is-- cute. That is honestly the kindest thing I can say about her performance.  James may actually be the victim of having to carry Mr. Strait's D.O.A performance. As the more experienced of the pair she carries most of the dramatic weight, were that there was any to carry in such an airheaded film. Pell James is also saddled with carrying the supporting performance of pop star Ashlee Simpson who at the very least is more interesting to watch than our main character.

Steven Strait stars in Undiscovered as, I kid you not, Luke Falcon. Luke is a wannabe rocker on his way to L.A to make it to the big time. As he is getting off the subway with his brother Euan (Kip Pardue), on his last day in New York City, Luke has a cute encounter with Breier (Pell James). He drops his glove on the train and instead of retrieving it he tossed Breier the other glove just before the train doors closed. Remarking that he met the girl of his dreams on his last day in the city, Luke hops his flight for Los Angeles. What are the odds that Breier will soon be there as well?  It's no long shot, I assure you.

Breier is a model with dreams of becoming an actress, a confession she makes to her modeling agent played by the desperately slumming Carrie Fisher. Soon Breier is off to LA and the cutthroat world of "model slash actresses". It is through her acting class that she meets Clea (Ashlee Simpson) who happens to know Luke (He lets her sing with him at a dive bar). Luke and Breier meet cute once again but Breier cannot hook up as she has a rock star boyfriend who she knows is a cheating, lying bastard.... but she loves him. Ahh true love.

Luke and Breier stay friends and eventually she and Clea help Luke get a following at the club and the attention of a slimy record exec played by the oily Fisher Stevens. Soon Luke has his own model girlfriend played by Shannyn Sossamon, but the life of a rock star is too much for the earnest Luke who longs for the solitude of the songwriter.

No points for guessing that despite all of these roadblocks, Breier and Luke are meant for each other. This is, afterall, a teen romance. What is shocking, though, is how woefully inept the film is even from the limited expectations of its genre. Strait and James are embarrassingly hard to watch as they fumble the film's central romance like teenagers in a first time groping session.

The regrettable script, credited to first time writer John Galt is a meandering, overlong mess of typical romantic roadblocks and dialogue that would make the kids on TV's "One Tree Hill" roll their eyes. If you can somehow fight your way through the longest 93 minutes of your filmgoing life you will see the film end with the kind of Deus Ex Machina that even the lamest of screenwriting books make fun of. The ending involves a cameo by former RoboCop star Peter Weller that sounds as if he were channeling Christopher Walken, only a far less entertaining version of the man.

How serious was Lions Gate about making a real hit movie out of Undiscovered? The producers actually rewrote the picture and retitled the film for a pop song by Ms. Simpson that is naturally on the film's soundtrack. Ms. Simpson's father is credited as a producer on the film and there are two scenes with Simpson onstage that seem to stretch into eternity.

Much of the film is in fact filled out by musical performances from Strait and Simpson. Cut back on the music and Undiscovered might clock in closer to 70 minutes. That is still way too long, though, believe me. The fact is that Undiscovered is the kind of film that usually goes directly to video stores and yet somehow ended up on the big screen as a ninety three minute commercial for its abysmal soundtrack. For anyone who thought Lions Gate's template for success was Miramax, well it's actually something closer to MTV Films.

In what is clearly one of the worst years for cinema in recent history in term of film quality, the box office is doing just fine despite the slump talk.  Undiscovered ranks right near the top of the list of the worst films of the year. As Mr. Ebert famously said in the title of his book about bad movies, I hated, hated, hated, hated, hated, hated, this movie.

Relay (2025) Review: Riz Ahmed and Lily James Can’t Save This Thriller Snoozefest

Relay  Directed by: David Mackenzie Written by: Justin Piasecki Starring: Riz Ahmed, Lily James Release Date: August 22, 2025 Rating: ★☆☆☆☆...